Columbia University Settles Long-Standing Dispute Over Trump-Era Funding Cuts

Columbia University Settles Long-Standing Dispute Over Trump-Era Funding Cuts

Columbia University Settles Long-Standing Dispute Over Trump-Era Funding Cuts

Columbia University Settles Long-Standing Dispute Over Trump-Era Funding Cuts
Image from BBC

Columbia University has announced a significant settlement, agreeing to pay the former Trump administration $200 million to resolve a dispute stemming from allegations of antisemitism and other campus issues during Trump’s presidency. This agreement brings to a close a period of intense federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty for the prestigious university.

The dispute originated when the Trump administration, shortly after taking office, revoked $400 million in federal funding from Columbia. This decision, made in February of an unspecified year during Trump’s tenure, prompted the university to implement various campus rule changes demanded by the White House, including a reorganization of its Middle Eastern studies department.

As part of the settlement, a substantial portion of the previously cancelled or paused grants will be reinstated. The agreement formalizes many of the changes Columbia has already announced or implemented. It also mandates the appointment of a jointly selected independent monitor to oversee the implementation of the agreement’s terms.

Key adjustments resulting from the settlement include disciplining students involved in campus encampments related to Gaza protests, requiring protestors to display campus IDs, prohibiting face masks during demonstrations, increasing oversight of student groups, and expanding the presence of officers on campus.

Acting University President Claire Shipman stated that the agreement marks a crucial step forward, allowing the university’s vital research partnerships with the federal government to resume. She emphasized that the settlement was carefully designed to uphold the institution’s core values while safeguarding its independence. Columbia University maintains that the settlement does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing.

阅读中文版 (Read Chinese Version)

Disclaimer: This content is aggregated from public sources online. Please verify information independently. If you believe your rights have been infringed, contact us for removal.