DNI Gabbard’s Controversial Russiagate Memo Ignites Fresh Debate

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released a memo alleging that the intelligence community (IC) “manipulated and withheld” key evidence during the 2016 “Russiagate” investigation. The explosive document further claims that high-level Obama administration officials “weaponized” intelligence to orchestrate a “years-long coup” against Donald Trump, immediately sparking a fierce backlash and renewed scrutiny of the 2016 election interference.

Gabbard’s memo, which explicitly threatens former officials like James Comey, John Brennan, and James Clapper with prosecution for “treasonous conspiracy,” has been met with predictable support from MAGA loyalists and anti-national security state leftists. However, critics are quickly debunking the claims, asserting that a closer look reveals a “nothingburger” lacking actual substance and relying on blatant manipulation of evidence.

The DNI’s narrative centers on an alleged suppression of a December 2016 intelligence assessment that supposedly contradicted later findings on Russian election meddling. Gabbard suggests that former President Obama directed the IC to create a new assessment to frame Russian interference, even though previous reports found Russia lacked the capacity to alter election outcomes through cyberattacks on infrastructure.

However, analysts point out that the media reports Gabbard cites primarily concerned email hacks and leaks, not direct alteration of vote counts. Furthermore, the intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government directed email compromises was publicly announced in October 2016, prior to the alleged post-election manipulation. The memo also faces criticism for misrepresenting earlier intelligence reports and omitting crucial context, such as the bipartisan congressional pressure on Obama to initiate a review of Russian interference.

This latest memo echoes previous controversial statements by former CIA Director John Ratcliffe regarding the 2016 inquiry. Critics argue that Gabbard’s report is filled with dishonestly packaged information, serving to amplify the narrative of Trump as a victim of the “deep state” and a “coup.” The memo has also been a boon for Kremlin-backed media, which quickly seized upon Gabbard’s claims to denounce alleged American fraud.

Funding for this publication comes from reader support. To continue receiving the latest news and analysis, consider subscribing.

阅读中文版 (Read Chinese Version)

Disclaimer: This content is aggregated from public sources online. Please verify information independently. If you believe your rights have been infringed, contact us for removal.