本文是对AI领域近期重要文章 **Why do lawyers keep using ChatGPT?** (来源: The Verge AI) 的摘要与评论。

Original Summary:

The Verge article highlights the recurring issue of lawyers facing legal repercussions for using AI tools like ChatGPT in their work. Attorneys are increasingly relying on LLMs for legal research, but these tools are prone to generating inaccurate or “hallucinated” information. This leads to filings containing fabricated case precedents and citations, resulting in judicial sanctions and professional embarrassment. The article implicitly critiques the over-reliance on LLMs without sufficient fact-checking, exposing the risks associated with integrating AI into legal practice. While LLMs offer potential time-saving benefits, the article emphasizes the crucial need for human oversight and verification to ensure accuracy and avoid legal pitfalls. The consequences of unchecked AI use underscore the importance of responsible AI integration in the legal profession.

Our Commentary:

The article’s focus on lawyers’ misuse of ChatGPT underscores a critical challenge in the burgeoning field of AI: the gap between the promise of technological efficiency and the practical realities of implementation. While AI tools like ChatGPT can potentially streamline legal research, their susceptibility to generating false information presents a significant risk. The consequences – judicial reprimand and reputational damage – serve as stark warnings against blind faith in AI. This isn’t simply a matter of technological incompetence; it highlights a deeper issue of professional responsibility. Lawyers have a fundamental obligation to ensure the accuracy of their submissions, and relying on an unverified AI tool shirks this responsibility. The incident raises questions about legal education and professional development – are lawyers adequately trained to critically evaluate and utilize AI tools? Moving forward, a nuanced approach is crucial, one that integrates AI’s potential benefits while emphasizing the indispensable role of human judgment, verification, and ethical considerations in legal practice. The long-term impact could involve new ethical guidelines, stricter regulations, and improved AI tools that minimize the risk of hallucination.

中文摘要：

The Verge的一篇文章强调了律师因在工作中使用ChatGPT等AI工具而面临法律后果的反复出现的问题。律师越来越依赖大型语言模型进行法律研究，但这些工具容易生成不准确或“幻觉”信息。这导致提交的文件包含虚构的案例判例和引用，从而导致司法制裁和职业尴尬。这篇文章含蓄地批评了过度依赖大型语言模型而没有进行充分的事实核查，揭示了将AI整合到法律实践中所带来的风险。虽然大型语言模型具有潜在的节约时间的好处，但这篇文章强调了人工监督和验证以确保准确性并避免法律陷阱的关键必要性。不受控制的AI使用的后果凸显了负责任地在法律职业中整合AI的重要性。

我们的评论：

本文关注律师滥用ChatGPT，凸显了人工智能蓬勃发展领域的一个关键挑战：技术效率的承诺与实际应用的现实之间存在差距。虽然像ChatGPT这样的AI工具有可能简化法律研究，但它们容易产生虚假信息，这构成了重大风险。由此可能导致的司法谴责和声誉损害，是对盲目相信AI的严厉警告。这不仅仅是技术能力不足的问题；它突显了更深层次的职业责任问题。律师有义务确保其提交材料的准确性，而依赖未经验证的AI工具则逃避了这一责任。此事引发了对法律教育和职业发展的质疑——律师是否接受过充分的培训，能够批判性地评估和使用AI工具？展望未来，需要采取细致入微的方法，既要整合AI的潜在益处，又要强调在法律实践中人类判断、验证和伦理考量不可或缺的作用。长远来看，可能需要新的伦理准则、更严格的法规以及能够最大限度减少幻觉风险的改进型AI工具。

---

本文内容主要参考以下来源整理而成：

https://www.theverge.com/policy/677373/lawyers-chatgpt-hallucinations-ai