Senate Braces for Crucial Vote on Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Amidst Deep Divisions

The U.S. Senate is currently navigating a complex legislative minefield as President Donald Trump’s ambitious ‘big, beautiful’ tax and immigration package, recently passed by the House, faces an uncertain future in the upper chamber. With a razor-thin Republican majority, Senate Majority Leader John Thune faces the daunting task of uniting his conference to secure the 51 votes needed for passage, all while a July 4 deadline looms and a potential August debt default threatens.

Despite the House’s jubilant approval, senators are approaching the multi-trillion-dollar bill with caution, highlighting numerous sticking points. A primary concern among many Republican senators is the bill’s approach to tax cuts. While supportive of tax breaks, particularly making them permanent, they diverge from the House’s shorter timeframes for many cuts, including those on tips and overtime pay. This sets up a procedural showdown, as Senate Republicans argue that extending existing taxes permanently does not necessitate offsetting spending cuts, a stark contrast to the House’s proposed $1 trillion in reductions across Medicaid, food stamps, and green energy programs.

Spending reductions are another major hurdle. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) is a vocal critic, pushing for a return to pre-pandemic spending levels and indicating he would oppose the bill as it stands, claiming support from at least three other senators. While stricter work requirements for older Medicaid recipients, accounting for a significant portion of the bill’s $700 billion savings from the program, generally find favor, concerns persist. Senators like Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), and Susan Collins (R-Maine) worry about potential cuts to rural hospitals or increased healthcare costs for recipients. Hawley even reported President Trump’s direct instruction: ‘Don’t touch it, Josh,’ regarding Medicaid.

The bill’s attempt to shift some food stamp program costs to states also raises alarms, especially for red states with high numbers of food aid recipients. Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman expects lower savings from food aid in the Senate version.

Beyond fiscal matters, the bill’s provisions on the debt ceiling and clean energy credits are sparking significant debate. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has stated he will not support the bill if the debt ceiling increase is included, preferring it be addressed separately, despite others fearing such a move would require concessions to Democrats. Furthermore, several Republican senators, including Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), have voiced strong opposition to repealing or phasing out 2022 clean energy tax credits, arguing it would jeopardize investment and job creation.

Other unique challenges include the bill’s proposed decade-long ban on state and local AI regulation, an industry-favored approach that has drawn bipartisan concern and may face procedural hurdles in the Senate. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) has declared the bill’s handling of spectrum auctions a ‘dealbreaker,’ while Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) is pushing for the inclusion of farm safety net programs.

With every senator’s priority taking on outsized importance in the narrowly divided chamber, the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ faces a perilous journey. The coming days will reveal whether Senate Republicans can bridge their internal divides to deliver on the President’s ambitious agenda, or if the package will undergo significant revisions before any potential passage.

阅读中文版 (Read Chinese Version)

Disclaimer: This content is aggregated from public sources online. Please verify information independently. If you believe your rights have been infringed, contact us for removal.