Putin’s Stance on Ukraine Ceasefire: Demands for Lasting Peace and Territorial Gains Emerge
Putin’s Stance on Ukraine Ceasefire: Demands for Lasting Peace and Territorial Gains Emerge
New details reveal Russian President Vladimir Putin’s firm conditions for any potential ceasefire with Ukraine, as discussions around a U.S.-proposed truce continue. While Ukraine signaled openness to a ceasefire during recent talks in Saudi Arabia, Putin has consistently rejected temporary halts to hostilities, asserting they would only benefit Ukraine and its Western allies by allowing them to rearm.
Putin insists on a comprehensive, lasting settlement rather than a brief truce. His core demands, reiterated since the full-scale invasion in February 2022, include Ukraine renouncing NATO membership, significantly reducing its military, and protecting Russian language and culture. Crucially, Moscow now demands Kyiv withdraw forces from the four regions Russia has partially seized.
The Kremlin’s cautious response to Ukraine’s acceptance of the truce offer reflects Putin’s awareness of the diplomatic risks. Instead of outright rejection, observers suggest Putin is likely to link any truce to specific conditions that safeguard Moscow’s interests. This could include a halt to arms supplies to Kyiv and the holding of a presidential election in Ukraine, which Moscow believes would allow it to influence Ukrainian politics and foster friendly relations.
Furthermore, Russian officials have indicated that any peace deal must involve unfreezing Russian assets in the West and lifting existing U.S. and EU sanctions. Putin also emphasizes the need to address the ‘root causes of the crisis,’ referring to NATO’s military buildup near Russian borders. With Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s term having expired last year, Moscow questions his legitimacy to sign a peace deal, an argument echoed by former U.S. President Donald Trump.
Analysts note that while Putin may not issue a categorical ‘no’ to a ceasefire, any agreement would likely be on Russia’s terms. The process, especially if driven by Washington, could lead to outcomes favorable to Moscow, as demonstrated by previous brief halts in U.S. military assistance and discussions around sanctions relief.
Disclaimer: This content is aggregated from public sources online. Please verify information independently. If you believe your rights have been infringed, contact us for removal.