Judge Halts Trump’s Attempt to Deploy National Guard in LA Amidst Fiery Protests and Disinformation Campaign
Judge Halts Trump’s Attempt to Deploy National Guard in LA Amidst Fiery Protests and Disinformation Campaign
A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the Trump administration’s controversial deployment of the California National Guard to Los Angeles. The move comes amidst a backdrop of intense protests against ICE raids, fueled by a surge of online misinformation and alleged foreign interference.
The protests, initially sparked by immigration raids, have become a battleground for disinformation. Experts warn that Russian media and pro-Russian voices have amplified right-wing conspiracy theories, falsely claiming, for instance, that the Mexican government orchestrated the demonstrations. Simultaneously, right-wing American voices online allege a secret, leftist cabal is behind the unrest, echoing tactics used during past protests.
California Governor Gavin Newsom strongly condemned the attempted National Guard deployment, calling Trump’s actions “dictatorial” and an abuse of power. He highlighted the lack of proper notification and procedural violations, arguing that the federal government overstepped its authority. Newsom’s criticism was echoed by other officials.
The judge’s ruling, which cites violations of federal statutes and the Tenth Amendment, temporarily returns control of the California National Guard to the state governor. The Trump administration has appealed the decision, setting the stage for further legal battles.
Adding to the complexity, a federal criminal complaint alleges that an individual was arrested for providing face shields to protesters after an unlawful assembly was declared. This arrest, along with numerous other arrests across various cities during related protests, further underscores the escalating tensions.
The situation remains fluid, with ongoing protests and legal challenges. The judge’s decision marks a significant victory for those opposing the administration’s actions, but the underlying issues of immigration policy and the spread of misinformation continue to fuel the controversy.
Disclaimer: This content is aggregated from public sources online. Please verify information independently. If you believe your rights have been infringed, contact us for removal.