Leaked Blueprint for Gaza’s Future: Tony Blair Proposed to Lead Controversial International Authority

Leaked Blueprint for Gaza’s Future: Tony Blair Proposed to Lead Controversial International Authority

Leaked Blueprint for Gaza’s Future: Tony Blair Proposed to Lead Controversial International Authority

Leaked Blueprint for Gaza's Future: Tony Blair Proposed to Lead Controversial International Authority
Image from Middle East Eye

A detailed draft plan for the post-war administration of Gaza, reportedly backed by the White House, has been leaked, revealing a controversial proposal that could see former British Prime Minister Tony Blair at its helm. The plan, which surfaced last week via Haaretz, outlines a three-year transitional authority aiming to govern the enclave after Israel’s ongoing conflict.

Named the Gaza International Transitional Authority (Gita), the proposed body would be overseen by an international board of seven to ten members, holding “supreme political and legal authority.” This board is slated to include billionaires and business figures such as Marc Rowan and Naguib Sawiris, a senior UN official (Sigrid Kaag cited as an example), and “at least one qualified Palestinian representative.” The document also emphasizes “strong representation of Muslim members” to ensure regional legitimacy.

While Tony Blair’s name is not explicitly in the draft, multiple media outlets suggest he is being considered to chair Gita. The chairman would serve as the “senior political executive” and “principal spokesperson,” appointed through “international consensus” and UN Security Council endorsement – notably without mention of Palestinian consensus. Blair’s past involvement in the Iraq war and dealings with autocratic regimes raise questions about his ability to secure widespread international support. Initially, Gita’s senior officials would operate remotely from locations like El-Arish, Cairo, and Amman, with a gradual deployment into Gaza over three years.

The leaked document details a hierarchical structure placing the international board and chairman at the top. An “International Security Force” would manage crossings and prevent the resurgence of armed groups. At the very bottom of this structure is the “Palestinian Executive Authority,” which despite its name, would possess little independent power. This technocratic body, separate from the Palestinian Authority, would manage essential services like health and education, led by a “Palestinian Chief Executive Officer” appointed by the international board. All Palestinian appointees would be subject to strict “political neutrality” standards and performance reviews, ensuring complete subordination to the international board.

The plan also includes provisions for a legislative supervisor to ensure adherence to international law and a judicial board, preferably chaired by an Arab jurist, to oversee justice sector reforms. Interestingly, it mentions legally protecting the “right to return” for Palestinians who voluntarily leave Gaza, a promise likely to be met with scepticism given historical context. While the plan suggests eventual handover to the Palestinian Authority, no specific timetable is provided. This blueprint, with its business-like structure and limited Palestinian autonomy, is poised to generate significant debate regarding Gaza’s future governance.

阅读中文版 (Read Chinese Version)

Disclaimer: This content is aggregated from public sources online. Please verify information independently. If you believe your rights have been infringed, contact us for removal.